Do you mean that supporting a genocide is a centrist policy?
- 0 Posts
- 127 Comments
It was not overlooked, it was weaponized. Just like in Germany in the 1930’s.
The turning point was 2001. The liberals thought they could use that enemy from within and they thought they could handle the fascists, until they became the fascists. Now they are just like the fascists, but people hate them more than ever, so they directly side with them in order to not be left over when the vanilla fascists takes the power.
A French youtuber did a study on porn, to see if it was violent as lawmakers make it seem. And as a matter of facts, the titles and tags rarely represent what it actually is.
My guess step mom is a side category to milf.
If you deny that this meme is disdainful of the “there is a loneliness epidemic” statement, then you’re in bad faith.
Even if what you’re saying is logically true, that’s not the truth people see, as this thread demonstrates. Which means you’re in bad faith here.
If you had any education in logic, A => B => C means something.
When you do this logical development, it means C is the consequence of A.
The même format also implies that C is a stupid assertion, because it’s associated with the clown figure. It says that the existence of a loneliness epidemic is a stupid proposition.
This is denying reality. And this is mocking the people who suffer from loneliness.
The biggest problem is not even the link between incels and loneliness epidemic. It is the denial of the problem. This is litteraly akin to conspiracy theories.
And the progression means thatl only incels come to this conclusion. Which is where it is insulting to many men who aren’t incels.
Except it makes the link with loneliness, which has nothing to do with incels. By doing so, this kind of post litteraly says that alllonely men are like the worst incels.
It is insulting. And it is directly feeding the narrative of the fascists that says that feminists are mere anti-men instead of pro-equality.
This même is a blend of arrogance, ignorance, disdain and malice. Even the fascist are rarely doing so bad.
Yet another idiot who can’t co’'ect two braincells.
Tell me, don’ t you feel like a hypocrite to blame the fascists from disdaining empathy while you are incapable of showing any either?
And you are also an ignorant idiot and an asshole. The lack of empathy and understanding here is absolutely baffling.
No, only sad that people who call themselves progressive are making propaganda for the fascists to recruit.
This is missing the point it’s embarrassing how stupidly wrong and antagonising it
And then you will wonder why young men are misogynistic I guess. The answer is that you’re a fucking antagonising moron.
We shouldn’t have to work to sustain a family, this idea is archaic.
If we want gender equality, it will have to be forced.
Yes. And I haven’t seen as many zealots there than on lemmy.world. There’s not as zealous as the liberals there.
They’re not centrist anymore because they purposefully side with fascists.
But no one supports the authoritarian USSR except idiots. So why is there propaganda against it?
It’s litteraly like doing propaganda against the French Empire of Napoléon. That stuff is dead and even the biggest moron are not stuck to it anymore.
I’m talking about the west obviously, where litteral nazi are parading in the streets and developing their networks irl and on social médias, and those libtards are doing absolutely nothing about it.
Holy shit I’m not sure if this is sheer liberal stupidity or outright Israel propaganda!
While this is somewhat true, in all of the west there are only 3 groups currently : liberals, fascists and leftists.
Liberals are a diverse group, ranging from socio-democrat and liberal green parties to libertarian who leans on fascism.
Fascists are all the brands of conservatives who leverage racism, authoritarianism and nationalism.
Leftists are basically the groups opposed to both fascism and liberalism.
Those are 3 objective groups. They are the groups that determine how likely they will cooperate or oppose each other, or how elections will turn.
Some parties will be a bit in between, but that’s merely political communication. In practice a group that promote itself as a middle group is actually leaning right. This means that “leftist liberals” (who range from some green parties and movements to the socio-democrats) will always pick liberals if they must choose between them and the left. Likewise, conservatives and libertariens are leaning toward fascism when given the choice.
The political spectrum is radicalised and triparted. You can deny this model and blur the information, but it usually means that you are leaning more to the right than you are pretending.
Are a anarcho-capitalists considered anarchists here?



I am of the opinion that green are very often left wing conservatives.