It’s also on individuals, our purchasing choices shape what corporations decide to make. if people only bought fuel efficient vehicles companies wouldn’t build these idiotic mega polluting trucks.
And trucks are vastly more dangerous for pedestrians than other vehicles. they have massive blind spots, and weight a shitton more. As trucks have kept getting bigger, pedestrian deaths have gone up, that’s why we bring it up.
Hey, they aren’t good at nothing. They excel at killing pedestrians.
Having a vehicle that emits more pollution, does more damage to roads, and is more likely to kill pedestrians is pretty fucking selfish and deserving of hate.
I just rent a uHaul for $20.
Labor for a single grilled cheese is super easy. If you’re selling a lot of them this could be decently profitable.
I mean, both have toxic stupid people, but Reddit does still have way more niche communities and activity. I still rarely go back to Reddit, and mostly chill on lemmy.ca, but it is missing many subreddits I liked.
Did I say it was acceptable? No, I said it was underwhelming.
What I’m arguing is it is not a normally viewed part of the game, because the vast majority of players will never see it.
When asked if it’s a normally viewable part of the game the other poster stated it wasn’t because you basically never go down there. yes that one.
Are you incapable of understanding context?
It’s right above my first one, find it yourself.
No it won’t, you just want to tarnish the definition of normally viewed.
Percentages mate, percentages. If only 2% of players see something, it is not normally viewed.
And yet another poster who said it’s not normally viewable is positively upvoted. So nope, I’m not wrong.
Nope, you’re wrong. When something is down a completely optional, hidden side questline, that you can only get to if you keep Sarah as a follower, and do her whole questline, it not normally viewable.
What, maybe a couple percent of players may end up there? Yet everyone is going to see the spaceport, and the lodge. Those are normally viewable areas.
My comment says I agree the waterfall is shitty, did you miss that part?
And no, I’m not incorrect, when a person asks if it is a normally viewed part of the game, that means viewed commonly by everyone. The waterfall is not a normally viewed part of the game.
It is shitty, and it shouldn’t be, but it is not normally viewed by most players.
Don’t put words in my mouth. And I spent $0 on it, gamepass for the win. I still enjoy the game, even with it’s shitty waterfall.
No, I’m just correcting the poster who says it’s a normally viewed part of the game. Are you unable to read or understand simple context?
Yeah, I have a Ryzen 5600X, 32 GB Ram, Radeon 5700 XT, installed on an SSD, and gamepass as well. I’ve had no issues, other than a single spinning spaceship, and my follower getting stuck on a doorframe temporarily.
Crazy the variety of experiences.
And crashing on consoles I just expect now, devs are making games way too demanding for base level consoles.
A completely optional mission, in a completely optional romance line, that you only see once should you choose that one romance quest out of the options. Normally seen in a game is something like the New Atlantis Spaceport, which every player sees multiple times in a playthrough.
Though I do agree, I did that romance, and was certainly underwhelmed by the waterfall.
Well in my case it is up to the standard, because it’s run perfectly fine for me. I installed it, and have been running it on high graphics with no crashes, and only minor positioning bugs.
So you and I have had very different experiences with the game.
The provincial conservatives where I live are trying their best to destroy that universal healthcare. It’s rather infuriating.