• 0 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 6th, 2023

help-circle






  • This is an extremely strange way to describe the Chinese Civil War and the Second Sino-Japanese War. At best reductive in the extreme and at worst comically misleading.

    It’s literally the definition of a civil war.

    OK, so you do understand at least some of the differences between civil war and settler colonialism.

    Is the difference that ita colonialism if you need a boat to get there? Because I should point out Taiwan is an island.

    The Chinese nation is unquestionably older than any European or North American nation embodied in the current European and North American states, because there is unquestionably a Chinese culture that can be traced from those previous polities, which considered themselves Chinese.

    And this would be that cherrypicking I mentioned. I don’t fault that, because every method is cherrypicking, because there isn’t a “true” or “best” system.

    What I do fault is that you seem to be completely incapable of recognizing it when it happens on your team, but can spot it easily when going “America bad”.


  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workstoLefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comNone of it is the US
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    China has been around for thousands.

    China as it is now was formed by having a giant fucking war against people who were ready to die to prevent themselves from being part of China as it is now. Just like pretty much every other country in all of history.

    The difference between china (and pretty much every other country in Europe and Asia) and the is that those wars were at least mostly fought by people who actually lived there.

    My point is, you can’t just say “this country is X years old”, because it almost never is, and it always depends on cherry picking. You can say Germany turns 36 this year, or you can say it turns 1226. Italy was either created in 1946, or the 3600 years ago at the founding of Rome. China can start with the Zhou dynasty 3000 years ago, or with Mao 70 years ago.

    None of those are completely true, and yet they aren’t entirely wrong either. Thats why these maps are stupid. Proclaiming your state to be the best because some people had a state where yours now is is pretty dumb.

    And ALL of them got where they are by killing people who didn’t want to be part of their state. Every single one.


  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workstoLefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comNone of it is the US
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    The thing is, no part of the land that currently falls under the Peoples Republic of China has been part of the PRC for more than 100 years, because the PRC didn’t exist before 1949. Almost all of the US predates that, except for (I think) Hawaii.

    Were the Chinese Imperial dynasties the same thing as the PRC is now? And even if it was, the Republic of China was in between the two, and it even still exists.

    So, you can complain about the US, but the Chinese state is MUCH newer, and had a huge fucking war about large swathes of it not wanting to belong to the state relatively recently.

    Both maps aren’t extremely disingenuous.


  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workstoLefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comNone of it is the US
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Going to play devil’s advocate here a bit, but the US has had a continuous state since 1789 for parts of it, since the civil war for other parts, and the late 50s for small bits. It should be half orange, half yellow, with splotches of white.

    The current Chinese state was formed in 1949. This entire map should be white. The Republic of China predates its formation by at least a year, and one could argue by some 30 years.