I suspect the issue here was confusion around what “it” was as the sentence has two possible subjects - “the cat” and “tail”. Given cat was the primary subject, it probably assumed you wanted the arrow pointing to the cat.

The article mentions and switches between “lawyers for the state said California” and “lawyers from then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office”, which sounds like it’s intentionally conflating Harris’s direct involvement

It looks so happy now that it has it’s taco!

Would you suggest that a location that houses thousands of books that are available to borrow and/or use for research is not a library?

You mean like southern states banning books because they are “offensive”?