Yes, I read their posts just fine, nothing you said is news. I objected that “there’s no evidence Russia has ever done genocide before” is not a coherent argument against the allegations that Russian forces are committing genocide previously. I also disagree there’s no evidence it’s happening now, but the particular argument that “they didn’t do it in a different war, so they can’t be doing it in this one” is just absurd on its face and was the one I wanted to reply to the most.
Argument for what? I’m pointing out that you’re doing genocide denial and suddenly I’m saying someone should get attacked? Being against genocide denial doesn’t mean I think anyone should get attacked you goof.
Notice how I said absolutely nothing about whether I think the war is great or what anyone should be doing, and yet you projected all these views onto me, just because I said genocide denial is wrong. Rethink your life, friend.
So because Russia had other conflicts where they didn’t commit genocide, it’s impossible for them to commit genocide in the future? Or if they do start doing genocide them it’s actually someone else’s fault?
Weird amount of genocide denialism and victim blaming from a self processed passifist
No, no, you’re definitely in the wrong here. Let’s go through the play-by-play;
So this here is a post, from AlteredEgo. In it, they said that Russia doing things in the past that weren’t conquest and genocide meant that somehow genocide cannot be happening now.