• J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wait, what the hell?

    I can’t believe this, who the hell are they to decide what I should install?

    They are welcome to curate their own store, but sideloading concerns only the user.

    Hopefully, the EU and other jurisdictions block this.

    Fucking corrupt American oligarchs.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Hopefully, the EU and other jurisdictions block this.

      This is very similar to the notarization process Apple introduced to comply with the EU requirement of allowing third-party stores, and yet the EU doesn’t seem concerned (maybe because Apple did not allow third-party stores in the first place, will it be different for Google?)

      • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not an Apple user, so I didn’t know about this. Extremely disappointing.

        It really does seem avoiding any and all American services/products (to the extent possible, with exceptions where reasonable) is the only way forward.

        I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that the US is a ethical, cultural and even economic dead end. Yes even economic, only a fool would believe intense corruption and broad support of criminality and corruption among the population will not have any negative effects in the future.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You think this wouldn’t happen elsewhere?

          It’s not just an American thing, it’s an asshoke thing, and those people are everywhere, and will always find a way.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The EU can’t even distribute their own apps without Play Integrity. Seems unlikely they will care.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Google says it’s no different than checking IDs at the airport.

    You’re not a fucking airport, Google!

      • Don_alForno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Better. We bought the airport. Google was paid to pave the runway and maintain it for a couple years after. And now they try to dictate that only planes they approve may start and land.

  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Google says it’s no different than checking IDs at the airport

    What, and Google is now the TSA? Fuck that shit. I’ve paid for my device, I get to do whatever the hell I want with it!

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The current trends and direction of tech is making me want to become Amish…

    I’m getting so fucking sick of everything turning into shit, what’s even the point of fucking point anymore? This is borderline kernel level enshitification

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I heard that they’re probably going to be using the Google Play store and probably similar modules to play protect to enforce this. So the question becomes will disabling the Google Play store bypass this? It outright kills play protect dialogue as well as its app disabling capability as a whole since play protect is part of Google Play store.