Osmand has a very bad search function - or very good, it returns exactly what you look for and nothing else.

Sometimes you have to look it up somewhere else, add it to osm and be happy that the person after you can find it.

Wrong post?

You’re right. It woudl be better to focus on a smaller area with good data instead of a huge area with bad data. Shit in - shit out

H1: Methodology H2: Overview H3: Project/Author H2: Process H2: Conceptual Framework H2: Data Sources H2: Place Type Taxonomy H2: Scoring Methodology

And nowhere the methodology is explained. The term Methodology is used in the 6th second level header. But it doesn’t describe what they do

Why do you share it?

It looks overengineered to me.

It puts the name of the author above the methodology and the methodology doesn’t even include how it is measured.

Llm …

Llm?

Niemand würde Organic Maps ins deutsche übersetzen …

Missing Maps London